The misguided puritans
"Downtown: Dealing with drunks, pushy panhandlers" - WFP
Similar to how the Downtown BIZ deals more with homeless men and women who walk into the Tim Horton's on Fort and Graham instead of dealing with the bangers brazenly slinging crack in Portage Place and along Portage Avenue from Carlton to Edmonton, people will go after the owners of these old vestiges of Winnipeg's growth and prosperity because they're easy targets: they don't golf together, they don't sit on boards together, they don't have money and favors tied up with each-other, and hotel owners don't buy advertising. Political allies didn't have a hand in creating those hotels, their owners don't control the funding taps, and downtown was not "reborn" when they opened.
No one is willing (or able) to begin to see the problem at it's core, which is the state of moral and economic decline of downtown Winnipeg, which began long before gruff and intimidating panhandlers became a fixture on Main Street, nevermind Portage Ave.
One relatively easy thing that could be done to mitigate the problem being complained about by Centre Venture or David Rattray, is to end the antiquated monopoly of the Manitoba Liquor Control Commission, who fuse the worst aspects of socialism and Victorianism, and play gangster and cop all at once. Imagine if Al Capone and Elliot Ness worked together: that's the MLCC.
As someone commented on the Free Press story: "Many other provinces separate the liquor licensing agency from the liquor distribution agency. Probably we in Manitoba should do the same thing. Have the MLCC only handle licensing and control. Have a new Manitoba Liquor Distribution agency to handle liquor imports and
sales." Far better yet would be to get the government out of the distribution and sales industry altogether. Separate the conflict between selling beer and enforcing laws, and Winnipeg will have not only a more responsive liquor commission, but a freer market that un-slums the business of buying and selling alcohol downtown.
Making the owner of the Garrick or Woodbine the whipping boys will do nothing. Close them down, and the unsavory characters move over to the Vendome, the Windsor, or the McLaren. Close them all down, and the use of non-potables rise (higher than it was prior to the introduction of $2 king cans several years ago), and the decline of the big, nice downtown hotels will only accelerate their current decline. (Tragically, the gorgeous Marlborough Hotel is currently in a state the McLaren Hotel would have been at circa 1970.)
***
It's best not to take too much stock in comments on CBC Manitoba, but here's some from yesterday's story on the Woodbine:
"I am much more wary of going to Portage Place than I would be of walking by the Woodbine, because there are far more incidents that happen at Portage Place. I would like to see something done about the crime there, starting with cleaning up the drug dealing that goes on in the food court."
"Why not focus more on the drug dealing and violence happening in and around Portage Place? That's a much bigger concern for me as a downtown resident."
"There are more incidents at Portage Place than at the Woodbine but Centre Venture stays silent on that."
"The Woodbine has its share of sketchiness, but I'll add my vote to those who would make Portage Place a priority, after seeing someone blatantly shoplift a large purse in front of me this past weekend, then waiting fifteen minutes while security casually made its way to the store in question..."
"I also agree... that Portage Place is a serious problem... and will not go there AT ALL!! Geez they have shootings there at 1 in the afternoon. The last time I was in the Food court, I counted 5 drug deals go down and one of them was to a security guard for the mall!!"











