Thursday, July 16, 2009

The glass hidden in the grass

A half-cooked, pie-in-the-sky masterplan for Point Douglas. Is it that time of year already?

A couple of months ago, Sel Burrows, Wanda Koop, Jordan van Sewall, and one or two others sat down over brunch with Premier Gary Doer to talk about Point Douglas. The talk got on the subject of one industrial land owner or another, and how that land, if in the wrong hands (say, the hands of those that are in the business of making money rather than distributing or recieving it) could become mixed-use condos or some other urban affliction. The Premier stops it right there; looks at them and says "Well, what if we [the Provincial government] expropriate the owners and make it into a Provincial Park?"

What would this look like? No one knows. When I asked one of the brunch attendees where exactly this park would be located, they could not say for certain, only that it would likely stretch along the entire bank of the peninsula neighborhood, from the north end of Waterfront Drive, all the way around to the vicinity of Norquay Park.

...but isn't it a good thing Gary Doer didn't forget to consult the community about what they think of his idea? [h/t to PHiebert]

How this works with regards to private property rights, the CPR mainline, the impending Disraeli and Louise Bridge projects, the City's secondary plan for south Point Douglas, and the citizens of Point Douglas that don't brunch with the Premier; again, no one knows.

No one knows how this will revitalize the neighborhood, since no one understands urban neighborhoods, or applies that knowledge to Winnipeg. This plans looks to simply be urban renewal in its most vile, misanthropic form, and will do nothing to make Point Douglas the wonderful place it could be. But I suppose when you don't understand or like cities, it makes sense to just expropriate them and cover them with grass. Native grass, of course--it's not the '50s anymore.

Premier Doer liked his idea of a Provincial Park, he told the crowd at the table, because it has precedence: the Manitoba Club/Friends of Upper Fort Garry, who were able to bring a Provincial Park to the corner of Fort and the soon-to-be-lost Assiniboine Avenue. This will be even easier for the prominent Social Democrat faithful of Point Douglas: no fund-raising campaigns needed, just set up a lunch date at the Premier's office, attempt to scare the locals with mentioning the phantom gated community idea from a few years ago, and just sit back and let the park come to your doorstep.

This pointless idea is rooted in arrogance from top to bottom. The Provincial NDP, obviously, exudes arrogance (and with good reason; who is critical of them anymore?). The tiny cabal of artists in South Point Douglas who want the whole neighborhood to themselves, are either too arrogant or too deluded to see that they make no sense: they want shops they can walk to, but they don't want cars or density; they want improvement, but they don't want their property taxes to rise (no joke); they want diversity and affordable housing, but want the Province to first concentrate on bike paths; they want the bear patrol, but they won't pay taxes for it.

Can we just have a little honesty down in Art Land? Can it just be said out loud:
We artists want the neighborhood to ourselves. We want our houses and studios and nothing more. We don't want other people to live here, we don't want other people to drive here. And we want this all without an increase to our property tax bills.

Anyway, giving this story to the Free Press this week worked as a nice diversion stunt for a Premier that lords over the men and and women who once lived the life of kings, but are now content with feeble servility. Please wake me up in a couple of weeks, when this plan is forgotten and people like King Gary the Superlative leave Point Douglas alone, for another year at least.

Looking toward Winnipeg from Point Douglas, 1872

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Phony demand

177

That's how many parking spots were available at the City-owned parkade next to the Library at 2:30 P.M. on a Tusday. Two hours later, it was practically vacant. This is an underground parkade (heated in the winter) that is connected to the skywalk system, and is two blocks east of the Hydro Building, two blocks west of Portage and Main. If there is a demand for off-street parking spaces downtown, I don't see it.

Monday, July 13, 2009

Country mice

How is it that just three councillors from the suburban fringes of the nominal City of Winnipeg (Old Kildonan was little more than service stations and scrub brush 20 years ago) are all that come between the urban quality of the Exchange District and some brainiac with an idea for a parkade? (I'm dying to read what green and creative gimmicks are going to be added to the Grain Exchange's parkade. Is a penguin-themed-plaza still in the works?)

If there are members of Council who do not at once grasp how laughably pitiful arguments like "the proposed parkade will contribute to the ongoing vitality of the Exchange District National Historic Site and will contribute in a positive manner to the streetscape by replacing a large parking lot," why are they the ones that decide the fate of the Exchange District?

Another knee-slapper, also found at the City Clerk's desk: "The owners of the Grain Exchange building have been encouraged by both the Winnipeg Parking Authority and the Forks North Portage Partnership to construct a parking structure to meet the demands on downtown parking created by the growth of Waterfront Drive [where every single unit has at least one indoor parking space] and the pending Canadian Humanities Museum. The structure, if constructed on the site of the Annex, could access the skywalk system through the Grain Exchange Building."

The side of the Grain Exchange Annex seen from inside the Northern Sales Building, c.1953, when Lombard Avenue had a whole lot more of what it can't ever get back. Credit


Related: Progressive Winnipeg - The myth of parking

Thursday, July 09, 2009

Zzzzz pt.2

Downtown BIZ Events - The Role of Parking as a Catalyst for Downtown Development

It not being worth any serious discussion, my thoughts on this matter are summed up rather nicely here.


Thanks to Gord for bringing this important even to my attention.

Monday, July 06, 2009

Zzzzzz

Will somebody please wake me up when the Exchange District is totally and finally destroyed? This lazy and half-cooked approach is getting too boring. The progress just isn't coming fast enough: there are still to many parts of this photo not coloured in red, yellow and blue; parking rates are still not as cheap as they were in 1995; there are still too many smaller, plainer, cheaper buildings standing in the Exchange District that could become home to small businesses; I still have a few friends who haven't yet left Winnipeg for Montreal and Toronto.

If we're going to allow a city to die at the hands of improvident yokels, let's do it with a little more pizazz. Otherwise, I'll just go back up to the lake and continue to think in past tense of downtown Winnipeg as a place with, at the least, a few clusters of cohesive urban forma.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

How hard was that?

At some point yesterday, someone painted a long stripe of white paint on Princess Street from Logan Ave. to McDermot Ave. or thereabouts. It is a bicycle lane, painted on a downtown street that has plenty of room for bicycle lanes. Bike lanes are not going to be the things that turn this city around, and might not prevent errant cab drivers from sharply cutting me off on my morning commutes down Princess, but it will say something: that the City gave some thought to the people who ride bikes.

Remind me again, how bike lanes were created in Winnipeg during the tenure of Mr. Visionary Talker again?

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Primary sources

This is really no big deal, but it was funny how, when commenting on Heritage Winnipeg seemingly not paying attention, both Average City and Policy Frog got the address of the Dennistoun house wrong.

So say it with me now, MSM, City Historical Buildings Committee, and bloggers: it is the Dennistoun House, at 166 Roslyn Road. And yes, Heritage Winnipeg, apparently it is even being taken off the municipal conservation list an so it can be demolished.

The more people refer to the website of the venerable old Manitoba Historical Society, the better off we'll be.

"I can't get no respect."

Monday, June 08, 2009

Pages from the past

Main Street is not a dangerous place, the story reporting this is not available online, and its reporter hit the pavement instead of the Rolodex. Just what decade did I wake up in on Sunday morning?

Anyway, Mr. Oleson's wholly enjoyable piece on the fabled Main Street Strip (at its most liberally defined span, 17 blocks from Portage up to Selkirk Avenue) touches on something that has been clear to keen downtown pedestrians for some time now: that Portage Avenue is in the same place Main Street was 25 or 30 years ago.

"It seems that Winnipeg's skid row has moved south, to Portage Avenue, where on any given day you will see more boarded-up buildings, panhandlers, public drinking and puking drunks than you will on the dreaded Main Street strip."

Indeed, who would have guessed that Portage and Edmonton would be more unsavory and dangerous than Main and Logan? Day or night, I know where I feel safer walking.

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Why are strawmen such haters? pt.2

People who are doing things:

BIOS Architecture, which began as a two-man operation at the corner of Main and Alexander Ave. last year, and will now be hiring and expanding.

Paterson Foods and Parrish & Heimbecker, two venerable agriculture companies that continue to be based out of offices in downtown Winnipeg. Prior to his death in 1963, my Great-grandfather A.W. Cross, a man of incredible business acumen, was a partner at P&H; a great man that helped make an important Winnipeg compnany great.

My former neighbors, who purchased a sordid rooming house in the bad old late '90s, moved in, renovated and sold (at a great profit to them) last year to a couple that moved here from Wolseley. And my new neighbors, who are putting in still more work in the house and in the yard, and contribute to the safety and civility of this charming little unslummed street.

Every person that has started a retail business in the Exchange District in the last five years. Any person that has started a business of any kind in this city.

Wellington West Capital Inc., one of the best companies in the country, and are growing apace.

Greenseed Development Corp. who are actually building new housing downtown on vacant land (and have so far not raised the jealous ire of the Friends of Fort Douglas).

Aqua Books and Eat! Bistro who completely transformed their Garry St. building, and are the best used bookstore in the city (and one of the best new cafes,) and keep a literary scene extant downtown.

Friesen Tokar Architects. Not that it was hard, but they built the nicest looking condo development on Waterfront Drive to date. And they moved the entire firm there.

The Black Sheep Diner at Ellice and Langside St., their proprietress and wonderful staff, who serve the best breakfast in town.

Those crazy Scotia Street socialists who re-opened Pollock's Hardware on Main and Atlantic Ave.

Andrew Marquess and B&M Land, who develops good market rental property across the city, especially downtown lately. He builds with geo-thermal, as opposed to putting out publicly-funded propaganda saying he would build it, then not.

Every person from my generation who left Winnipeg to find success in other cities.

The woman from Point Douglas who started a coffee shop on Sutherland near Annabella St. last year. Another Point Douglas woman who opened the Tallest Poppy on Main and Logan Ave. The young hippies who just moved in down the street that want to open up a laundromat and coffee shop here.

My good friend who is venturing out to develop iPhone applications, renovate his West End house, run marathons, and raise a daughter with his wife. Winnipeg grew by virtue of a hundred men like him that arrived here in the 1880s; not by a tired pack of fading grafters.

The men and women that flee violence, opression and corruption to come to Canada, and work tirelessly in corner grocery stores and restaurants for the sake of their children. Who still believe that one's mind and abilities can take them places.

Why are strawmen such haters?

Monday, June 01, 2009

We're all Manitoba Club members now

The growing shamelessness of their arrogance is astounding. "Gas station site added to heritage park at city's birthplace" - WFP

"The Petro-Canada agreement means the only existing building that will be left on the block that once contained Winnipeg’s birthplace is the Manitoba Club, which the Friends have no plans to purchase and demolish."

No kidding! Why would the Friends of Upper Fort Garry--21 of 37 of which are Manitoba Club members--want to do anything about the Manitoba Club other than enhance its south and eastward views?

And why would the same flock who bleated when 'conservative' Sam Katz suggested building condos on a parking lot of a City park, not utter a sound when the social democratic Gary Doer wants to use "public money" to build a Provincial park around the most exclusive private club in the province?

I have written enough on this blog about this deceptive and embarrassing boondoggle, so I will direct readers to the article I wrote back in April 2008, which seems more poignant today than it was then:

With these buildings and roadway allowing for a heritage park, it becomes harder to ignore the fact that the Manitoba Club’s house at Fort and Broadway is the only property on this block not threatened by the Friend’s plans. When one considers the fact that many of the Friends of Upper Fort Garry are current members of this venerable club, the unquestioned occupation of this site stands out even more peculiarly.

While the Manitoba Club’s house is certainly the most impressive building on the block... it is also what obstructs the north gate the most. Were the clubhouse not standing, the gate would emerge from its hiding spot and face directly out to the intersection of Fort and Broadway.

[...]

Over the last few months, Winnipeggers buckled at the idea that on a vacant parcel of land adjacent to Upper Fort Garry’s site, an apartment would rise (or as many were led to believe condos--a synonym for yuppies). City Hall was heavily criticized for what was seen as a total lack of vision, and an attempt to desecrate the sanctity of an immensely historical site with crass commercialism and cronyism.

Would Winnipeggers, indeed all Manitobans, be affronted by an exclusive and private club being enveloped on two sides by a public park--mere feet from the so-called birthplace of Winnipeg--any less than they would by an apartment built in a city with a lack of new affordable housing?

Speaking against the proposed apartment building Mr. Hilderman speculated that not only would the smell of barbeques emit from the balconies, but so would the sounds of tenants yelling at their kids. (Who is to say that apartment dwellers would not also hang their laundry from clotheslines between Fort Garry Place, or let their kids play hop-scotch and stickball in the middle of Fort Street?)

Expecting the Manitoba Club pack up and move after 104 years at Fort and Broadway might be fanciful, but so is believing that the private club at its current address--with no high-rise neighbors to pollute the future tranquility--would not be the ones benefiting the most from a largely public-funded park at Upper Fort Garry.


Related:
Policy Frog - "Beacuse they own it"
Average City - "Freep staff writer slips one in"
Anybody Want a Peanut - "What is the value of 142 Main?"

Friday, May 29, 2009

Starnesville

David Asper wants a two percent sales tax for Winnipeg, and sees it as a way way Winnipeg can achieve it's potential, blah, blah, blah. He calls this the "Control our Destiny" plan.

A good start, but with more passion, more fire, and more vision, I suggest that this plan is simply not good enough. I propose we increase the municipal sales tax to four percent. That way, we could achieve twice as much of our potential, get twice as much done, be twice as better, safer, prosperous, enjoyable and beautiful of a city than we would under Asper's proposal. And, needless to say, four times better than we are now. I call this "Be the Masters of the Universe" plan.

Two cents for every dollar; isn't that what Canwest shares are trading at?

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Builder beware

It seems that my post on Green Seed's nine-month wait for permits for the Youcube condo development on Waterfront Drive was noticed in certain offices around town, and served as grease for the wheels a little. And so it may be possible that Green Seed may actually get the go-ahead with a few months of the 2009 construction season to spare.

There is something not right when Centre Venture needs to spend their time encouraging PP&D (and one of their structural reviewers it particular, it seems) to do their jobs in a timely and competent fashion for (unconnected) developers. Whatever gets the job done, I guess. And in this environment, the job of getting market housing developments approved downtown does not occur often. I wonder why.

Anyway, here is an annotated (and abridged) chronology of the Gong Show:

09.09.08 Architect Applies for foundation permit

05.01.09 Permit Tracker confirms Permit has Been Awarded
Architect calls the City to check the progress of the permit. They are informed that the permit has been awarded. Architect informs Client. 1 hour later the City calls back to inform the Architect that they were mistaken.

27.03.09 Architect Resubmits full Architectural and Structural Drawing Set in Response to Phone Conversations
Full Permit Architectural Drawings are resubmitted to provide a current coordinated drawing set for reference purposes only, as specifically requested by the structural examiner. Structural examiner ensures architect that the project will be a high priority.

09.04.09 Architect Follows up with the structural examiner to discover a full, new sealed drawing set is now required, ‘not for reference only’, as previously requested. Architect is also informed that further review will take additional 3-4 weeks from the date of the new submittal.

15.04.09 Architect Resubmits full Sealed Architectural Set in Response to Phone Conversations
Current, sealed Architectural drawings reflecting both phases of the building are submitted at the insistence of the Structural Plan Examiner.

21.04.09 Phone Conversation Regarding Fire Protection Issues
As sealed Architectural drawings now reflect both phases of the development, fire protection issues that were to be ignored until phase 2 are being looked at again contrary to previous letters + agreement between the City and the Architect.

27.04.-06.05 Architect Over 10 working days Architect leaves three phone messages with the structural reviewer.

06.05.09 structural reviewer responds via e-mail simply stating that the review process is still underway, there is no indication if the current drawings will be acceptable.

15.05.09 Architect Calls the city repeatedly, requesting information on the status of the application.
Upon architect insisting, permit coordinator arranges for a conference call with the head of Plan Examination Department, Structural Examiner and Architect to try to provide a solution to the drawn out process, and try to find how to move the project forward. Architect finally receives a letter stating that full pile calculations must be provided by the structural examiner. [4 weeks after submission]

19.05.09 Engineer Submits full design load calculations to the city once again.


***
It is worth pointing out that this is residential development occuring not in some industrial-zoned corner of South Point Douglas. It does not contravene Plan Winnipeg (for what that is worth). It is not a 50-storey tower, or a stucco garage-fronted detached house (though maybe GS would have better luck if they did that...) It is multi-family infill on Waterfront Drive, which one will recall was built some years ago by the City to serve as a catalyst for exactly this type of development. It should be easier than this.

Monday, May 25, 2009

What's exciting

This one has been a long time in the making (I mentioned it way back in an October 2007 column in the Free Press), but a hair salon and shoe boutique has opened on Main near Bannatyne Ave., one door immediately north of the Woodbine Hotel (effectively shutting down the local logic, from all sides of the spectrum, that says rich and poor can not co-exist in the same urban space).

I could never cease to be excited by small developments like this occuring in the Exchange District. This one especially, for being right on Main Street.

Photo by Adrian S.

Suction

And people wonder why Winnipeg does not see more housing being built downtown...

Green Seed Development has been waiting for the City's Property Planning & Development department to provide them with permits for their Youcube condominium development since Autumn of last year. They lost 20 contractors who were ready to go, and most of the orginal buyers, who have understandably moved on to other options. Green Seed had to go through Centre Venture and later the Mayor's office to get so much as a response from anyone at PP&D. And yet Green Seed still waits for permits that were coming "in three days" last Autumn.

Youcube is not even located inside South Point Douglas' heavy industrial zoning designation, so residential development is already permitted there. So why is it that the City is so averse to the construction of the first market housing units built in South Point Douglas since the Andrews Sisters dominated the pop charts? Why does the developer have to acquire suction through through Centre Venture and the Mayor's office to build something on Waterfront Drive? What exactly do they do over there at Fort Street? (Maybe that would make a good blog post on speakupwinnipeg.ca: "Hey Winnipeg: What kinds of housing developments would YOU like to see Winnipeg city planners dither on?")

As someone at newwinnipeg.com pointed out on this issue, there are three sides to every story. Fair enough. But somehow I doubt that PP&D goes into winter hibernation whenever Shinidco, Ladco, or the Province comes up with a new development to approve for the city's edge. Why is that in order for something to be built--something the City has ostensibly "wanted" for the past 40 years: dense infill housing in the central city--does one have to wait for six months to get the neccessary permits?

I am starting to wonder, in spite of the wonderful game many of them can talk, what exactly it is that city planners want for Winnipeg, and South Point Douglas in particular?

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Worth remembering, not celebrating

Celebrating the general strike of 1919, playwright Danny Schur told the Free Press: "we tend to forget -- there's no institutional memory."

Indeed. But what exactly would Schur and other revisionists have us remember? Paper boys beaten by grown men for selling newspapers outside the sanction of the strike committee? Babies in the North End coming close to starvation because "the means of production" of milk were under the control of the Strike's "Food Committee"? Mayor Gray being beat up in plain view of indifferent policemen? A police officer shot in a gunfight at Higgins and Main? Probably not. Somehow, I doubt that any of the 5,000 people in lawn chairs on Main Street yesterday were "dazzled" by scenes portraying these events.

I missed the opportunity to ask my great-grandmother, who was 16 and living in Winnipeg at the time, about the strike. But it might have been that, like many people who lived through it, she would not have liked to talk about that experience. There is the local newspapers that continued to publish through the time. Winnipeg Telegram strike editions, or the Committee of One Thousand-published Winnipeg Citizen

And if hoary old newspapers are not your thing, read Ian Angus' article in the latest issue of this country's pre-eminent socialist magazine, Canadian Dimension.

"[R]ecently, the history of the Winnipeg General Strike has been rewritten by social democrats who describe the strike as just an attempt to win collective bargaining. The strikers were misunderstood heroes and the government response was reactionary and repressive, but only because it didn’t understand.

"But glory be! Despite those unfortunate misunderstandings, the strike led to the creation of the CCF, which led to the NDP, the ultimate party of discussion, compromise and mutual respect. Unfortunately for the social democratic interpretation, most of the leaders of the 1919 strike wave were not social democrats they were revolutionary socialists. And the experience did not lead them to the CCF it led them to build a new revolutionary party, the Communist Party of Canada."


Let us remember the strike for what it was: a failed attempt to overthrow British law and capitalism in Canada. A socialist revolution similar to the one that was destroying Russia at the time. But maybe it was not a complete failure: for six weeks, the city was in the grip of violence, fear, lawlessness, and hunger. Sounds like manifest socialism to me.